Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies

Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies

Love Never Dies.Nov. 13, 1992128 Min.
Your rating: 0
8 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies, Full Movie Online – This version of Dracula is closely based on Bram Stoker’s classic novel. Young barrister Jonathan Harker is assigned to a gloomy village in the mists of eastern Europe. He is captured and imprisoned by the undead vampire Dracula, who travels to London, inspired by a photograph of Harker’s betrothed, Mina Murray. In Britain, Dracula begins a reign of seduction and terror, draining the life from Mina’s closest friend, Lucy Westenra. Lucy’s friends gather together to try to drive Dracula away..
Plot: When Dracula leaves the captive Jonathan Harker and Transylvania for London in search of Mina Murray, the reincarnation of Dracula’s long-dead wife Elisabeta, obsessed vampire hunter Dr. Van Helsing sets out to end the madness.
Smart Tags: #dracula #vampire #female_vampire #vampire_human_love #based_on_novel #horror_movie_remake #supernatural_power #female_nudity #mina_murray_character #orgy #bouncing_breasts #sex_scene #vampire_sex #bat #insane_asylum #vampire_bite #decapitation #monster_sex #one_word_title #train #jonathan_harker_character


Find Alternative – Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

7.4/10 Votes: 219,804
77% | RottenTomatoes
57/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 4262 Popularity: 40.422 | TMDB

Reviews:


This Seductive, Thrilling, love story has some Bite! Based from the book and is a true masterpiece. Gary Oldman plays Dracula and simply makes this movie. His obsession with Winona Ryder characters is relentless and heart chilling. Don’t worry Keanu Reeves doesn’t ruin it, he actually did a great job. Anthony Hopkins plays the role of Dr. Van Helsing. We all know his story now thanks to Hugh Jackman. Some brief nudity and a HOT scene with Winona as she runs though the garden in her PJ’s. Not only do I gave Bram Stoker’s Dracula 5 stars, BUT I rate it in my Top 10 all-time. MUST SEE!
Review By: J4stringthang

Gets worse on repeat viewings.

Francis Ford Coppola’s take on the Dracula legend sees Gary Oldman as the Count, who as a warrior prince returns from battle to find his true love, who after believing him to have been killed, has committed suicide. Renouncing his Christianity he pledges to return from the death to enact revenge on humanity. Century’s later he is back to keep his word but becomes infatuated with Mina (Winona Ryder) who bears a resemblance to his long dead true love.

Forget the Bram Stoker bit, this is liberty taken wholesale, and forget any notion of this being a scary Dracula movie, for this is Gothic romance opulence. There is no doubting that as a production design goes, it’s top dollar, costumes, photography, score, sets and puppetry etc, all the money is up there on the screen to please the eyes and the ears. But the narrative shift to make Dracula a tragic longing figure is a mistake, as is several casting decisions and performances. It’s actually easier to say who comes out of it with credit, so step up Tom Waits as Renfield and Richard E. Grant as Dr. John Seward. Oldman is committed to the lead role, and has tortured soul down pat, but someone thought it was a good idea to make him an old ponce and stick a set of buttocks on his head! You just can’t take the character seriously from the moment he appears on screen.

There’s some vampire erotica as Coppola caters for the horny horror faithful, though these scenes play out like an after midnight MTV video, so not really very sexy at all. While there’s a lot of fun to be had, yes you read right, with a number of scenes inserted within the dull narrative: did the great Anthony Hopkins just sniff the cheese and Keanu Reeves attempt a posh British accent? Aaargh! It should have been a Gothic classic, but clearly Coppola was out of his depth tackling such a genre. After giving myself over ten years between returning to watch the film again, I can say with confidence that it’s a film that gets worse on repeat viewings. That is unless you like unintentional comedy pictures? 3/10

Review By: John Chard
Oldman is the Best Dracula Ever!
This is the best rendition of Dracula ever captured on film. Gary Oldman’s dark and sensual personae outshines any other vampire who ever dare put on a cape. To me Gary Oldman is the most talented and underrated actor ever. He becomes who he is playing, however in this role… Dracula became him… Oldman set the bar so high it is untouchable even to Bela Lugosi. Winona Ryder’s delicateness suited the role of Mina/Elisabeta nicely and Keanu Reeves played the unsuspecting and naive Jonathan with satisfaction. However the whole movie comes together because of Gary Oldman’s intoxicating essence. He draws the viewers into his darkness and passion and guides them through until the end. This film is drastically romantic and hauntingly captivating- just like a real Dracula movie should be. The cinematography deserved Oldman’s phenomenal performance and perfectly created a true vampire realm. Francis Ford Coppola is brilliant. This is the spirit of the vampire.
Review By: Moonlyn
Francis takes on Dracula and makes it into a masterpiece
One of the best known and most popular Dracula films is by Francis Ford Coppola. At the time he really hadn’t made a hit film since The Godfather, he was going bankrupt. So what better way to get out of debt than to make something that is pretty much a guaranteed thing that audiences will love? We got the scares for the boys and the romance for the girls and it equals Dracula. Many people ask me what is with the appeal of vampires? My opinion; it all equals sex. The dashing handsome man coming into the young lady’s room at night confessing his desire for her and her giving herself completely to him is not only romantic, but dangerous and filled with adventure. I always found it funny that Dracula was supposed to be the villain of the story, but he’s offering to take the girl on this incredible adventure through the world and time yet her usually bland boyfriend doesn’t want it that way so he rips her from that experience I don’t know, maybe I just look at things too differently. However moving onto the film, Francis took on the classic tale claiming to be “Bram Stoker’s Dracula”, not really being 100% faithful to the novel and really over glamed it, however still made this into a very good movie.

In 1897, newly-qualified solicitor Jonathan Harker takes the Transylvanian Count Dracula as a client from his colleague R. M. Renfield, who has gone insane. Jonathan travels to Transylvania to arrange Dracula’s real estate acquisition in London, including Carfax Abbey. Jonathan meets Dracula, who discovers a picture of Harker’s fiancée, Mina, and believes that she is the reincarnation of Elisabeta, his long lost love. Dracula leaves Jonathan to be seduced by his brides and sails to England with boxes of his native soil, taking up residence at Carfax Abbey. In London, Dracula appearing young and handsome during daylight, meets and charms Mina. When Mina receives word from Jonathan, who has escaped the castle and recovered at a convent, she travels to Romania to marry him. In his fury, Dracula transforms Lucy, her best friend, into a vampire. The men: Van Helsing, Holmwood, Seward and Morris kill Lucy. After Jonathan and Mina return to London, Jonathan and Van Helsing lead the others to Carfax Abbey, where they destroy the Count’s boxes of soil. Dracula confesses that he murdered Lucy and has been terrorizing Mina’s friends, but a confused and angry Mina admits that she still loves him and remembers her previous life as Elisabeta. At her insistence, Dracula begins transforming her into a vampire. The men are now determined to save her before her transformation is complete by killing Dracula.

What makes this film so special compared to other Dracula movies? I think it was Gary Oldman’s performance, he made a very memorable Dracula. Ranging from creepy and disturbing to romantic and charming. I think a lot of people connected with the love story, even if it was over romanticized, a lot of people would like to think that “love never dies” and someone would “cross oceans of time to find them”. Does the film have flaws; oh yeah. Between the laugh fest that was the battle of the bad accents between Keanu Reeves and Winona Ryder. There are scenes that are very over the top and over acted, sometimes also equaling a little too MTV generation. However, you cannot deny that the style of the film is absolutely memorizing and very elegant. The costumes and sets are very stunning and who could forget Dracula’s “butt” hair-do? This film has had so many parodies making fun of the lines and hair, but I think that goes to show the impact that the film had. It also started a stream of the Universal Studio remakes with “Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein” and “Wolf” later on. The film may be flawed, but I still love it. It’s not faithful to the novel, but gets more things correct compared to other films like Dracula’s death and some lines directly taken from the novel like “Yes, I too can love”. I think this will go down in the horror classics when it comes to vampire movies, it’s got class, violence, blood, style and a lot of sex appeal.

8/10

Review By: Smells_Like_Cheese

Other Information:

Original Title Bram Stoker’s Dracula
Release Date 1992-11-13
Release Year 1992

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 8 min (128 min), 2 hr 35 min (155 min) (original cut)
Budget 40000000
Revenue 215862692
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Drama, Fantasy, Horror
Director Francis Ford Coppola
Writer Bram Stoker, James V. Hart
Actors Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder, Anthony Hopkins
Country United Kingdom, United States
Awards Won 3 Oscars. 24 wins & 25 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Dolby Atmos (Blu-ray release)
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arriflex 535
Laboratory FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA, Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA (color) (prints)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm (Eastman EXR 50D 5245, EXR 500T 5296)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (2017 remaster), Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Eastman 5384)

Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Bram Stoker’s Dracula 1992 123movies
Original title Bram Stoker's Dracula
TMDb Rating 7.44 4,262 votes

Similar titles

Who Made the Potatoe Salad? 2006 123movies
The Meg 2018 123movies
Sick Boy 2011 123movies
Dare 2009 123movies
Dry Blood 2017 123movies
Frost 2012 123movies
She Wolf Rising 2016 123movies
Love and Honor 2006 123movies
Killer’s Moon 1978 123movies
The Brazen Bull 2010 123movies
The Elementary Particles 2006 123movies
To Fool a Thief 2013 123movies
TVMuse.app