Fathom 2021 123movies

Watch: Fathom 2021 123movies, Full Movie Online – Fathom is a visual and aural wonder of a documentary that follows researchers working to finally decode the communication of humpback whales. With Dr. Michelle Fournet, Dr. Ellen Garland..
Plot: Two biologists set out on an undertaking as colossal as their subjects—deciphering the complex communication of whales. Dr. Michelle Fournet and Dr. Ellen Garland journey to opposite hemispheres to uncover a culture eons older than our own.
Smart Tags: N/A

Find Alternative – Fathom 2021, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.7/10 Votes: 542
	58% | RottenTomatoes
	67/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 10 Popularity: 3.373 | TMDB

Reviews:

Really boring
The most terrible documentary film I had ever seen, it is super boring, I cannot help but kept using +10 secs while watching this.

This was a boring & poorly made documentary.
In an interview with Neil deGrasse Tyson, on ‘StarTalk’, Michelle Fournet said that their intention is to not have a conversation with animals, such as whales; it is their intention to study animals in their natural environment, deciphering their language while never allowing the animals to know that they are there. In this documentary…it is more or less completely the opposite! They say in this documentary that after studying whales songs for so long it is their intention to (re)create whale songs, themselves, and play them to the whales and, then, see what, if any, response that they get from the whales due to their, attempt to obtain, communication with them. The only difference being that, in this documentary, they are trying to fool the whale(s) into believing that the humans are in fact not human; that the whale(s) are, in fact, having a conversation with another whale. (Yea, maybe I missed the part in that interview where they said that they were trying to do this in the rest of their research – but, only do that in this documentary… But, I don’t think so!)

Well, perhaps I should bother to mention that I don’t know that whales are, necessarily, cognitive & freethinking, sentient, beings; but, even if they aren’t, & certainly if they are, they are, it’s pretty obvious, nonetheless certainly aware of human existence by the very reality that human beings have been polluting the environment, on an industrial scale, for about 300 years…& to a lesser degree for a lot longer! (The Industrial Revolution began in Europe in, approximately, the year 1730.) Humans have actually been polluting the environment for thousands of years; they have only been doing it on such a widespread systematic scale, at an industrial level, for only about three centuries. For example: Some people say that dogs are cognitive & freethinking, sentient, beings; others say this only about certain breeds of dogs. Some people say this about cats, too. Well, whether they are or are not, dogs & cats know that by licking our faces in the mornings as we are asleep, barking/meowing at us & waking us up, that we will get up & feed them, that we will take them/let them go outside, to go to the bathroom, to meet their friends, get some exercise, chase a ball, etc.

So, they know that we are there whether or not they are cognitive, freethinking & sentient! Trying to hide ourselves from their gaze only serves to waste time as we foolishly tell ourselves that we are doing something for some _’greater good’,_ when we are expressing a willful ignorance about what we are, and have been, actually doing. While I am glad that the narrative was different for this documentary, than it apparently was for that interview, there was some obvious lack of professionalism involved in the work of both of the two scientists focused on in this documentary, in particularly, however, that Michelle Fournet! This was made even more gratuitous when the aim of Michelle Fournet’s research shifted rather intensely, from trying to focus on one whale, that they apparently chose at random, to casting a wider net…trying to talk & listen to multiple whales at the same time, which actually makes a lot more sense. It seems that they initially did not give much thought to how to conduct their research, before this specific field work began. I get the impression that they believe, & that at least Michelle Fournet believes, that critical thinking skills are not a good idea, to even have access to them, when conducting scientific field work.

Maybe this field of study is very worthy of the philanthropic money donated & high tuition costs of the universities, & which is obviously needed, to conduct this kind of work. Unlike a number users talkin’ trash about this film on here, I do believe that it is worth it. But, what I don’t believe is that this field of study truly needed a documentary; especially one that gives it such a bad name. Or maybe it’s just these two very boring scientists… Michelle Fournet, specifically, appeared to be quite devoid of a specific critical thinking skill, specifically that of common sense, when they dumped fuel from the motor of their boat, during this documentary, polluting the environment that the whales live in! I understand that a specific ‘rule of thumb’ applies to medical doctors & may not apply to those in other areas of science; but, maybe it should…

‘Do. No. Harm.’

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime N/A
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated TV-PG
Genre Documentary
Director Drew Xanthopoulos
Writer N/A
Actors Michelle Fournet, Ellen Garland, Christopher T. Tessaglia-Hymes
Country N/A
Awards 1 win
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix N/A
Aspect Ratio N/A
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format N/A
Cinematographic Process N/A
Printed Film Format N/A