Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies

Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies

A romance ahead of its time.Sep. 16, 2005127 Min.
Your rating: 0
7 1 vote


Watch: Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies, Full Movie Online – The story is based on Jane Austen’s novel about five sisters – Jane (Rosamund Pike), Elizabeth (Keira Knightley), Mary (Talulah Riley), Kitty (Carey Mulligan), and Lydia Bennet (Jena Malone) – in Georgian England. Their lives are turned upside down when wealthy young Mr. Bingley (Simon Woods) and his best friend, Mr. Darcy (Matthew Macfadyen), arrive in their neighborhood..
Plot: A story of love and life among the landed English gentry during the Georgian era. Mr. Bennet is a gentleman living in Hertfordshire with his overbearing wife and five daughters, but if he dies their house will be inherited by a distant cousin whom they have never met, so the family’s future happiness and security is dependent on the daughters making good marriages.
Smart Tags: #pride_and_prejudice #period_drama #england #based_on_novel #gentleman #bachelor #prejudice #mansion #marriage #strong_female_lead #english_country_dance #pianoforte #male_female_relationship #cousin_cousin_relationship #costume_drama #aristocracy #elizabeth_bennet_character #lydia_bennet_character #mr._darcy_character #charles_bingley_character #lady_catherine_de_bourgh_character

Find Alternative – Pride & Prejudice 2005, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


7.8/10 Votes: 297,025
87% | RottenTomatoes
82/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 6845 Popularity: 39.767 | TMDB


Good adaptation and performances from Knightley and MacFayden.
Review By: Andres Gomez

When I watched this version of the Austen classic prior to packing the DVD away for a move, I assumed ahead of time it would stay nestled behind the Colin Firth version as my second favorite adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. Now, however, pending my watching the other version again, this might indeed be my new favorite. Not due to any major differences in acting ability or in the writing, but rather for the way it nails down the little things, the stuff I may not have noticed the first time or two I watched it.

One simple example is of the portrayal of Mary, one of the servants in the Bennet household. She says hardly anything during the course of the movie, but a couple of times we follow her while she is singing as she works, and I found it utterly charming. And I think it illustrates, whether or not it was intended, that this is a pleasant house that servants did not dread to start their work days in.

There is also at one of the balls a long scene of dancing that shows several of the characters who are involved in subplots going on, all within this continuous shot. It is clever, and on one website it is said the camera was left running by accident; a happy accident if you ask me. Also, a few of the scenic moments, such as one time when Elizabeth merely stares lost in thought in the middle of great beauty, are amiable natural breaks in the action.

The acting is very good, of course, with this cast, but also their attitude is perfect. Brenda Blethyn excels in the thankless role of the silly mother, managing not to cross the line into looking outright ridiculous. Sutherland is — well, I will give any movie a try with him in it. Keira Knightly is, for me, astonishingly good. If you had described to me before I watched it the way, when she or her family is insulted, she looks jolted for a moment, but then with a short laugh or smile shakes it off, I would have said “Nope, that won’t work.” But it works. Her wit is sensational. I write fiction myself and always try to to feature witty female characters, and Elizabeth would fit right into my modern novels.

Dame Penelope Wilton is excellent as always, and Claudia Blakey shone as Charlotte. If pressed to find at least one small fault, I could only say that I think the writers and director (and possibly Jane Austen herself) may have underestimated Mary Bennet as a character. I have always thought that more could be done with her, in every version.

I am only sorry now I have to pack the DVD away for the movie, even if only for a few weeks.

Review By: Peter McGinn
What a shame.
Sorry to say but was disappointed in the film. It was very very rushed, as I suppose you can understand a movie length version of Pride & Prejudice would be and I felt that a lot of the major scenes were glossed over just to get through the story. As the movie is so rushed, unfortunately you don’t get to really know about and feel for each of the characters much at all.

Not only that, this movie is Boring. I say that with a capital B. 1/3 of the way through I started yawning and couldn’t wait for the movie to be over. As I have read the book and watch the BBC version, I knew how many scenes had to go, before I could finally leave the cinema. Mr Darcy whoever he is in this movie, definitely can’t act. He looks also too young to play Mr Darcy. Every word that comes out of his mouth is rushed like he needs to get through the script or something. Where is the build up? At first, he seems confused with everything. He is just bizarre! It all looks put on.

Was trying not to compare to the Colin Firth version but if you love that version, you will most likely be disappointed anyway.

The costumes are absolutely shocking. Where are the corsets? I know Elizabeth is poor, but I think she still knows how to dress as some sort of ladylike fashion, and hasn’t been brought up in a squaller. Her dresses indicates she might be the poorest peasant in all of England.

I didn’t agree with a couple of scenes in the movie in the fact, that I don’t think it would be considered proper in that society for men to do such things, honestly Mr Bingley who has wealth should know better. There is some things that are said that sound too modern for the period this movie is set in, and not at all like Jane Austen. Bingley’s character is shockingly donee, to me he behaves like a simpleton, not a character to like and respect. What about that laugh of his!!! I Wickham hardly has a presence and Mr & Mrs Hurst and a couple of other characters have no presence at all. Keira did okay, but it just ain’t the same.

Review By: ysic2

Other Information:

Original Title Pride & Prejudice
Release Date 2005-09-16
Release Year 2005

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 9 min (129 min), 2 hr 15 min (135 min) (Toronto International) (Canada)
Budget 28000000
Revenue 121616555
Status Released
Rated PG
Genre Drama, Romance
Director Joe Wright
Writer Deborah Moggach, Jane Austen, Emma Thompson
Actors Keira Knightley, Matthew Macfadyen, Brenda Blethyn
Country France, United Kingdom, United States
Awards Nominated for 4 Oscars. 13 wins & 59 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS (Digital DTS Sound), Dolby, SDDS
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arricam LT, Cooke S4 Lenses, Arricam ST, Cooke S4 Lenses, Arriflex 435 Xtreme, Cooke S4 Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, London, UK
Film Length (7 reels)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision2 500T 5218)
Cinematographic Process Super 35
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic)

Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Pride & Prejudice 2005 123movies
Original title Pride & Prejudice
TMDb Rating 8.092 6,845 votes

Similar titles

What Just Happened 2008 123movies
Second Spring 2020 123movies
Day of Days 2017 123movies
Risen 2021 123movies
The Football Monologues 2021 123movies
Mad Love 1935 123movies
Misbehaviour 2008 123movies
The Warrior 2001 123movies
Blood on the Land 1966 123movies
The Silence 1963 123movies
John and the Hole 2021 123movies
The Crush 1993 123movies