Star Trek Into Darkness 2013 123movies

Watch: Star Trek Into Darkness 2013 123movies, Full Movie Online – When the USS Enterprise crew is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis. With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one-man weapon of mass destruction. As our space heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew..
Plot: When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis. With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction. As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew.
Smart Tags: #sequel_to_a_reboot #star_trek #human_female #adult_daughter #tough_girl #sexy_alien #threesome #alien_planet #klingon #james_t._kirk_character #starship #captain #death #friendship #space_opera #terrorism #terrorist #outer_space #spaceship #alien #space_travel

Find Alternative – Star Trek Into Darkness 2013, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	7.7/10 Votes: 484,400
	84% | RottenTomatoes
	72/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 8218 Popularity: 33.935 | TMDB

Reviews:

Weak story for a movie with a huge budget.

Honestly, I think you will only like it if you are a Treky. In no other way you will be able to get any logic out of it and the fact that the Captain of the space ship is the first to get out to do field work.

**The following is a long form review that I originally wrote in 2013.**

_Star Trek: Into Darkness_, or _STID_, as the kids are calling it (which makes me sad ’cause it’s akin to both STI’s and STD’s) is, in my unprofessional opinion, a step up from the previous instalment (which I did still quite enjoy).

Both J.J. Abram’s 2009 film, as well as _Into Darkness_ did both, however, seem to have an issue I couldn’t overlook in common. And that is that both essentially feel like an incredibly drawn out episode of a TV show. And I’ve seen next to nothing of the old _Star Trek_ series, so it’s not from that sort of a view I’ve come to have this feeling. It’s just a sort of unshakable notion I developed after a few minutes from the start during each film. Even in this aspect, _Into Darkness_ is a slight improvement on its forebear.

This new _Star Trek_ film is, unfortunately, riddled with plot holes. Some… Or at least one, is completely unforgivable. They’re not enough to ruin the film per se, but it does make me wonder about Abram’s ability to be a showrunner in the future if he can’t even handle _Star Trek_. Right from the get go I had questions that could have easily been answered with only a couple of lines of dialogue’s worth of effort. Which was sad, because it cast a pall over what was, at its heart, an enjoyable piece of cinema.

Despite these issues worsening as the movie progressed, a congratulatory word does again have to go out to Abram’s and his team for their tweaked timeline. Working a way in which to successfully reboot the franchise, without belittling the integrity of the original was a great move (moreover, they’ve left themselves open for more deviations in the future, now that the concept is established). Very smart.

Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg, John Cho and Anton Yelchin returning is of course a big plus for me. Completely unsurprisingly there just as fantastic as ever. But, that kind of Tumblr user would I be if I didn’t give a special bit of praise to Benedict Cumberbatch (which all levity aside, is actually well earned from the Brit, who makes for a spectacular villain).

65%

-_Gimly_

I seem to be going against the trend here…
As much as I liked Abrams’ 2009 re-boot of the Star Trek series, I liked this second installment better. I think that’s because there was less of an obligation to fill up back-story, and more ability to go deeper both into plot, and into the emotions of these new, younger versions of the characters we now (re) know. Add to that Benedict Cumberbatch makes a complex and compelling villain, even if the character does borrow from other sources, including Rutger Hauer in “Blade Runner”.

The humor is funny, the emotional scenes have a real impact, the battles are exciting, the acting is excellent, the plot twists are clever, and the more epic ‘big’ moments are really effective.

There are flaws; some plot twists can be seen coming a mile off, there are a few painful cheats or jumps in logic, and a handful of too-easy coincidences. But for a big summer blockbuster this has more smarts, style, punch and humanity than most.

A Solid, Exciting Second Adventure; Cumberbatch is Awesome
It seems 2013 is the year of fan rage, as it seems pretty much every major summer blockbuster became the object of their unmitigated anger. While the others seemed to infuriate fans for changing details, STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS appears to fall on the opposite end of the spectrum. People seem aggravated that the filmmakers were too eager to reference the source material (while at the same time, simplifying it for a wider audience). In the case of just about every major movie released this summer, I feel like I’m in the minority of people who actually enjoyed them, and that includes our second adventure in the new STAR TREK universe. It wasn’t as good as the first film but it was a solid, exciting film and one of the best we’re bound to get. It begins about a year after the events of the first film with Captain Kirk using his command of the U.S.S. Enterprise to violate just about every rule in Starfleet. When an unsanctioned mission to save a primitive race from extinction brings the wrath of his superiors and puts him at odds with Spock, Kirk nearly loses his command position before it every truly gets started, but a terrorist attack on a Starfleet facility in London leaves him with no time to dwell on it. After suffering a personal loss, Kirk makes it his mission to hunt down this terrorist, a man going by the name John Harrison, and bring him to justice. Pursuing the man deep into enemy territory, Kirk finally confronts him to discover that he’s more than he appears to be and he might not be the largest threat on the horizon.

I really enjoyed INTO DARKNESS. It’s not quite as fun on repeat viewings but there’s still a lot I loved about this movie. For better or worse, our new STAR TREK is a more action-oriented franchise and the action is always bigger than life. I swear, J.J. Abrams primary mission in these movies is to put the Enterprise through as much pain and suffering as he can to get the money shots that’ll put audiences in the seats. We get the Enterprise falling through an atmosphere, rising out of an ocean, rising above clouds, rocketing out of warp speed every conceivably cool shot he can imagine, he’ll find a way to fit it into the movie. And I can’t complain because, frankly, the effects in this movie are so awesome that these shots look absolutely amazing. Of course, there are also plenty of brutal hand-to-hand combat and phaser battles because our new TREK isn’t a mission of peace. Once relegated to the occasional away mission, action is the name of the game now. The production design, makeup effects, and visual effects are all top notch as you’d expect from a nearly $200 million budget. No one can argue that this movie doesn’t look fantastic. It’s one of my favorite things about the new franchise; we get an updated, modernized interpretation of a classic universe. Speaking of classic, this movie manages to shoehorn in Klingons, tribbles, and casual references to Harry Mudd and Nurse Chapel.

And here is where it seemed to get a lot of negative chatter. The writers and director have been accused of straight-up ripping off STAR TREK II because (and I refuse to consider this a spoiler seeing as how Benedict Cumberbatch is credited as the character on just about any cast list you find) Khan Noonien Singh returns and the movie makes more than a few loving references to THE WRATH OF KHAN. To give my opinion, no, I am not outraged about all the little homages scattered throughout the movie and I believed the plot was different enough from anything done in WRATH OF KHAN to avoid accusations of laziness. Aside from a major sequence near the end of the film (now THAT is a spoiler and I won’t ruin it) that felt a little too on-the-nose and was resolved way, way too simply, I had no complaints in that regard. In fact, I thought Cumberbatch was an awesome Khan. He was sinister, intelligent, and an intimidating presence with his cold, calculating demeanor. He gave the constant impression that Khan was a powerful man and always in control of the situation, even when he shouldn’t be. He was not as eccentric in the role as Ricardo Montalban in STAR TREK II, but I think he gives an equally powerful performance. You believe this man would slaughter every man and woman in his path to achieve his goals. Alice Eve is another addition to the cast as a weapons expert who invites herself aboard the Enterprise on its manhunt while hiding her own agenda (dodging some more minor spoilers here), but she doesn’t do much. I don’t know, maybe next time, I guess.

If fans want something to complain about, there’re better things to complain about. Despite not having watched any of the series regularly in years, I’m pretty sure the Enterprise isn’t capable of flying within an atmosphere (which it does twice here), much less landing and taking off. How does the Enterprise go from Earth orbit to the heart of Klingon space in ridiculously fast time? How did Khan teleport across so many systems? Was another high- speed space jump sequence really necessary? I guess it must’ve been so popular in the first film they felt the need to do it again and up the ante. How was the construction of a warship kept secret in the middle of a bustling stat system? Why was the Klingon moon already destroyed despite not occurring until STAR TREK VI? Although I guess that last one could be copped up to the whole reimagined timeline bit. Regardless, the new franchise is one of mass appeal and, understanding that we probably won’t see a STAR TREK film like the old days, this one’s pretty good for what it is.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 12 min (132 min)
Budget 190000000
Revenue 467365246
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Director J.J. Abrams
Writer Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, Damon Lindelof
Actors Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana
Country United States
Awards Nominated for 1 Oscar. 7 wins & 59 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Datasat, SDDS, Dolby Atmos, Auro 11.1, IMAX 6-Track, Sonics-DDP, Dolby Surround 7.1
Aspect Ratio 1.66 : 1 (IMAX 70mm – some scenes), 1.78 : 1 (IMAX Blu-ray & 4K UHD – some scenes), 1.90 : 1 (IMAX Digital – some scenes), 2.39 : 1
Camera Arriflex 435 ES, Panavision Primo, C-, E-Series, ATZ and AWZ2 Lenses, IMAX MSM 9802, Hasselblad Lenses, Iwerks MSM 8870, Hasselblad Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo, C-, E-Series, ATZ and AWZ2 Lenses, Red Epic (some shots)
Laboratory Company 3 (digital intermediate), DeLuxe (color), FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA (35 mm and 65 mm dailies), Kelvin Optical, Los Angeles (CA), USA (digital intermediate)
Film Length 3,610 m (Portugal, 35mm), 3,622 m (8 reels)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 200T 5213, Vision3 500T 5219), 65 mm (horizontal) (Kodak Vision3 200T 5213, Vision3 500T 5219), Redcode RAW
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), IMAX (source format) (some scenes), Iwerks 8/70 (source format) (some scenes), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), 70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (also dual-strip 3-D) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)