Alice in Wonderland 2010 123movies

Watch: Alice in Wonderland 2010 123movies, Full Movie Online – Alice, an unpretentious and individual 19-year-old, is betrothed to a dunce of an English nobleman. At her engagement party, she escapes the crowd to consider whether to go through with the marriage and falls down a hole in the garden after spotting an unusual rabbit. Arriving in a strange and surreal place called “Underland,” she finds herself in a world that resembles the nightmares she had as a child, filled with talking animals, villainous queens and knights, and frumious bandersnatches. Alice realizes that she is there for a reason–to conquer the horrific Jabberwocky and restore the rightful queen to her throne..
Plot: Alice, now 19 years old, returns to the whimsical world she first entered as a child and embarks on a journey to discover her true destiny.
Smart Tags: #wonderland #alice_character #alice_in_wonderland #caterpillar_character #the_mad_hatter_character #march_hare_character #dormouse_character #miniaturization #enlargement #mistaking_reality_for_a_dream #disney_live_action_remake_of_animated_film #cheshire_cat_character #white_rabbit_character #white_queen_character #jabberwocky_character #dodo_bird_character #bare_shoulders #tweedledum_and_tweedledee_characters #red_queen_character #cheshire_cat #knave_of_hearts_character

Find Alternative – Alice in Wonderland 2010, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	6.4/10 Votes: 415,170
	51% | RottenTomatoes
	53/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 12528 Popularity: 54.634 | TMDB

Reviews:

_TL:DR
A modern sequel to a classic. Feels like it has a few narrative issues, but it wasn’t enough for me to really dislike it. (It gets a 6/10 on the Dragon-Scale, because the Jabberwocky has an amazing design and it’s walking looks so off-putting.)_

Alice… who hasn’t heard of or watched it at some point? This is a sequel to the original, Alice is now 19 when she returns to Wonderland. Which… she has no obvious memories of, which, for an adventure with the scope she undertook when she was younger, I find a little hard to believe.

She never acknowledges having any memories of Wonderland until the end of the movie. Which again, strikes me as odd, because even if she would write off her earlier adventure as a dream, you’d still acknowledge having seen it all before, right? Perhaps I’m just overthinking this, but even subconsciously you’d recognize some of the things you see… right?

In any case, Wonderland has gotten a lot darker and has gotten a healthy CGI coating. Which, might not seem super today, but I think it gives everything a very ‘this is not reality’ vibe. Which works in Underland’s favor in my opinion, it’s chaotic, lacking in conventional logic and absolutely infused with magic. And it’s bizarre denizens all immediately pop out at you, with many strange shapes, weird behavioral tics and tend to defy the laws of physics.

The story is a coming of age story, which is immediately set up in the beginning as Alice is forced into a marriage with someone she barely knows. Something not uncommon for the time it is set in. And during the movie she figures out who she is, someone who’ll do things her own way, prophecies and expectations be damned. Despite not being the easiest way, everything still falls into place eventually and the prophecy fulfills itself.

When she comes back to her reality, she turns down her chosen fiancé, gives everyone she’s encountered at her engagement party some snappy one-liners, which, they all seem to take in stride. She then takes up her father’s passion to establish brave new trade-routes all the way to China. Which, perhaps feels a little _too_ easy. (Considering everyone was calling her father insane for his plans, which she promptly takes a step further.) But then again, this is a story with talking rabbits, a hookah smoking caterpillar and playing card knights, so perhaps I shouldn’t take it so seriously.

All in all, a fun watch with a satisfying payoff in the end!

I loved the movie. Of course it’s a Tim Burton film and Johnny Depp is in the movie so it’s already a given. Story wise, I like it that it’s different from the usual Alice in Wonderland stories. I hope they Tim Burton will make the original movie though. The montage in the movie looks nice when they did the flashback. I love the colors. Anne Hathaway is great. I felt like watching a real life Disney princess. Of course Helena Bonham Carter is magnificent. With her big head that looks really natural, it adds to her funny character. And then there’s Alan Rickman. Although he’s just a voice of the caterpillar, once you hear his voice, you’ll know it’s him and it’s a great comfort.

My grade for this movie??? A. Wonderful story. Great cast. A movie that is pleasing to the eyes. I strongly recommend this to children, adults, and anyone in between. A great family movie.

Movie Review: ‘Alice in Wonderland’ is a beautiful world to behold
Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland is a sequel and not a retelling of the original children’s novels by Lewis Carroll. In this film, Alice is now 19-years old, and soon after the death of her father, is proposed to be married away. Feeling pressured, she runs off, following a white rabbit, which leads her to Wonderland, a place she only vaguely remembers from childhood. There, she meets past familiar faces as the Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp), the Blue Caterpillar (Alan Rickman), the Cheshire Cat (Stephen Fry), and eventually the Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter), who has been terrorizing the land with her harsh rule and beheading of heads. Alice finds out that her destiny is to end the Red Queen’s rule by slaying the queen’s dragon, Jabberwocky, as written in the prophesy. Along the way she meets up with all sorts of colorful characters.

If you remember, Steven Spielberg’s Hook was the live action sequel to Peter Pan. Similarly, Tim Burton’s film is very much like a close cousin, except it’s about Alice. The progression of the story is also kind of similar, where the main character, Alice, like Peter, must rediscover herself and finally defeat her nemesis. Likewise, both films are both elaborately staged, they are both about growing up and making choices, and there’s a big showdown. Chances are if one liked Hook, one will find many things to like about Alice.

Tim Burton’s version of the Wonderland’s environments are gorgeous, imaginatively created, lots of colorful details, and breathes life. The castles are sleek and intricately designed. The creatures are generally live versions (CG) of the Disney’s previous animated version, and they’re even more odder and fun to look at. I particularly loved the portrayal of the Chesire Cat in this film, and the way he snakes through midair like water feels very natural, although it wouldn’t feel so natural in real life. Only complaint I may have in terms of visuals would probably be where we see CG versions of natural creatures like dogs–they’re not particularly stylized so their CG-ness can be more noticeable.

Danny Elfman’s score fits the environment just right, giving added intensity when needed. This film is essentially Tim Burton’s playground and even if there wasn’t any story, it still would be plenty of fun to just watch the loony characters in their environment. I will add that 3-D aspect of it helped a lot.

Johnny Depp plays the Mad Hatter with usual gusto, as he brings much energy and quirkiness to such an oddball character. I suppose there is a mix of Willy Wonka and Jack Sparrow in there somewhere. Given that other characters are mostly or completely CG, Johnny Depp’s character can feel a bit of out of place, as he still feels human. Helena Bonham Carter as the big-headed (literally) Red Queen is fun, expressive, and extremely likable for such a short-tempered character. Mia Wasikowska is particularly noteworthy as Alice, which she plays with free-spirited pluckiness, charm, and beauty.

The story, admittedly, is a simple one, although it is to the story’s credit that Alice is now an adult–it helps since many happenings in Wonderland can be quite unfriendly, bizarre, and grotesque. Thankfully, no more worries about some dream causing some lifelong trauma to some poor child. I also appreciated the fact that her Wonderland, like dreams, is an extension of her frustrations with the “real” world, where she felt she had many “expectations” from outside forces. At the same time, it’s not like Where the Wild Things Are, where other characters are actually projections of real-life people from the main character’s life. For example, to read Mad Hatter as an extension of her father feels a bit like a stretch, although the Red Queen could possibly represent her future mother-in-law since they both dislike animals. Certainly, one can merely enjoy it at face value and the creativity of this world and be fine with it.

Overall, I enjoyed this world of Alice. In one sense, that may be the important thing, if one were to stick to the flavor of the original novel. The story within the Wonderland, I felt, wasn’t as poignant as “real life” moments, which were filmed with much love and detail. Given the fact that original story consisted of series of random events and character interactions, it was nice to see the characters work together a bit. The overall result isn’t something beyond what one would expect from this style of work, but it’s fun, and where it succeeds, it succeeds well, thanks to the consistency of Tim Burton’s imaginative visuals. *** out of **** stars.

For more of my reviews, you can follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/d_art

Treading water in Wonderland
Sometimes I think that I should like Tim Burton movies more than I do. Don’t get me wrong, the man has made some excellent films, such as the masterful Ed Wood. But all too often, despite an agreeable tendency towards visual flamboyance, I leave his films feeling somewhat underwhelmed. Alice in Wonderland is a case in point. It’s a movie where CGI effects rule the day. But the trouble is that the true weirdness that is at the heart of this story is not captured at all with all the computer-generated imagery on-screen. Sure it’s very efficient and well-designed but like CGI in general, it’s far too polished to really strike a chord and convince. There is a distinct lack of wonder in this Wonderland. The otherworldly weirdness is dissipated too by the use of overly-familiar voices to give life to the various denizens of this world, we are left thinking ‘Oh that’s Stephen Fry, hey isn’t that Alan Rickman, I’m sure that’s Christopher Lee and isn’t that the bloke from Little Britain, etc’. It consistently takes us out of the movie and grounds the characters in a way that is just counter-productive. We want weirdness from an Alice in Wonderland film, not slick CGI and famous voice-over actors.

There is also a dangerously cosy predictability at play here too. Tim Burton, Johnny Depp, Danny Elfman – they say familiarity breeds contempt, well that’s a bit strong but it IS seriously lacking in surprises and you cannot help think that all three individually talented men could do with taking a break from each other for the good of their careers. Depp’s Mad Hatter is pretty uninspired by his standards, while Burton’s visuals and Elfman’s music are nice but ultimately completely forgettable. I found it very difficult to care for any of the characters in this film, and that is never a good thing. It also meant that the conclusion came across as deeply trite, as we have been given nothing to empathize with. We don’t know or have any interest in these characters, so when Alice goes around her extended family one by one imparting her new knowledge onto them, it means nothing. It also doesn’t help that the journey to Wonderland has made absolutely no difference at all to the title character’s state of mind – at the beginning she does not want to get married to the upper-class chump and at the end she does not want to get married to the upper-class chump. So you are left wondering what exactly was the point?

I saw this in 3D and if there is one thing that this film has taught me it’s that I am done with this ‘new and improved’ technology. I sensed it was a gimmick even before I watched Avatar; now I am certain. A bad film is a bad film, and no amount of extra visual depth is going to change that one iota. It’s all surface-veneer, and really that’s this movie’s ultimate problem, there is nothing of interest within the CGI/3D. A great shame, as the source material is undeniably compelling.

I realize that I am almost done here but I have not even mentioned the worst thing about the film. What was it? It was when the Mad Hatter and then, subsequently, Alice do a truly cringe-worthy little dance near the end of the film. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. I half-expected Britain’s Got Talent winners Diversity to pop up in a cameo appearance at this stage and join in with some urban street dancing manoeuvres. That didn’t happen. And that is, at least, one saving grace.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 48 min (108 min)
Budget 200000000
Revenue 1025467110
Status Released
Rated PG
Genre Adventure, Family, Fantasy
Director Tim Burton
Writer Linda Woolverton, Lewis Carroll
Actors Mia Wasikowska, Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter
Country United States
Awards Won 2 Oscars. 35 wins & 63 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS-ES, Dolby Digital EX, SDDS, Sonics-DDP (IMAX version)
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Dalsa Evolution, Leica Lenses, Panavision Genesis HD Camera, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA (domestic prints), Technicolor, USA (color) (prints: international)
Film Length 2,946 m (Spain), 2,963 m (Sweden), 2,993 m (Portugal, 35 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision2 50D 5201, Vision3 500T 5219), Digital, HDCAM
Cinematographic Process Digital (4K) (source format), Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), HDCAM SR (1080p/24) (source format), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (spherical) (Kodak Vision Premier 2393), 70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (dual-strip 3-D) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)